This guide was prepared from earlier notes. The new build adds world controls, serving staff and further fixes. Check the current patch before following an older procedure.
Your first check
Day 1 notes penalise beer plus foam at 70% capacity or less. A no-foam comment alone is not a point deduction.
Separate the two messages
When a drink receives criticism, record the actual comment before preparing another. An amount complaint and a foam complaint describe different observations. A pour can have several properties at once, so fixing the appearance of its head does not tell you whether you changed the total fill enough. The threshold above describes one documented penalty; it is not a formula for perfect service or proof of a best liquid-to-foam ratio. We do not publish a 7:3 recipe as a measured game rule.
Build a useful pouring comparison
Use one order and the same mug type for a small comparison. Note what the current interaction prompt offers, then record the result after service. On the next comparable order, change only the part you are investigating. If you alter the mug, equipment, timing and fill at once, an improved result cannot tell you which change mattered. A picture of the delivered mug is useful alongside the comment, but a perspective image alone is a poor way to claim a precise volume measurement.
Keep tutorial completion separate from drink quality
A tutorial notification tells you about progress through an instruction; customer feedback tells you about what was served. Read the active objective when learning the dispenser, rather than using an old video as a substitute for the current prompt. If the machine refuses an interaction, stop the scoring experiment and inspect the machine's message. For a co-op problem, record whether the host and joining player see the same door state. That is a diagnostic observation, not a claim that only the host may operate the machine.
Keep a useful comparison
Use this sheet while you check the problem. Tick a row when you have recorded an observation, even if its outcome is still unresolved. Downloading creates a local text snapshot; it does not save your game or send a report.
| Check | What to record | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Total fill | Record any insufficient-beer comment | Threshold is not a perfect-score guarantee |
| Foam | Record the separate comment | Appearance and deduction are different |
| Tutorial | Capture the active objective | Do not infer score from completion |
| Equipment | Read the current action prompt | Do not guess a universal pour binding |
Watch the game in motion
These videos provide context for the kitchen and shop. Their presence does not verify the checks above. The cover images are credited game previews, not extracted video thumbnails.
GameTrailers / Wild Dog trailer · Source listing ↗
Official announcement preview. Use it to see the game in motion; it is not a walkthrough of this troubleshooting procedure.
Watch on YouTube ↗Miuneru / VOMS Project · Source listing ↗
Creator-listed Japanese gameplay session dated 14 October. Recorded before the 15 October update; background viewing, not proof of the new features.
Watch on YouTube ↗YouTube loads only when you press the play button. It can then receive your network and device information. Video privacy.
Questions before you retry
Is exactly 70% outside the penalty?
No. The published condition includes 70% or less.
Does this prove a perfect foam ratio?
No. The official notes checked here do not establish one.
How do I compare two attempts?
Keep the order and mug comparable, change one variable, and preserve the customer comments for both.
Sources and update scope
9 October Day 1 update v0.1.48.17626 ↗. Source reviewed 14 October 2026. An earlier official news check on 15 October returned v0.1.57.18549. For subsequent changes, compare the current patch reference. Patch notes are developer reports; community reports are player observations. Checklists and diagrams are our editorial suggestions.
This page has no release-build playtest, measured recipe or guaranteed workaround. Update it when Wild Dog changes the relevant mechanic or a reproducible report supplies better evidence. Send a correction with the source and version.